Prompt template
Run these steps in order.
01
I’ll help you update a blog post to better serve reader intent. We’ll research, evaluate, and refine it together, one prompt at a time. Do you understand? 02
Before we begin writing or updating, we’ll research the topic. Are you ready? 03
“Consensus content” means topics and ideas commonly shared by top search results for a query. Do you understand? Outline the top 5 categories of consensus content for topic. 04
The article’s audience is audience with considerations. What is their search intent: are they seeking information, a specific page or website, options before a purchase, or an action such as buying or contacting an organization? What do they care about in relation to the topic? 05
What challenges, pain points, or needs related to the topic might this audience want information or answers about? 06
Review the top-ranking pages for the topic. Considering the audience research and what readers want to know, identify information missing from most or all of these pages that the audience might value. 07
Research recent information or data on the topic from highly reputable sources the audience would consider trustworthy, focusing on work published within roughly the past two years. If suitable sources exist, summarize shared themes and notable quotes, references, or statistics. 08
Review the full existing blog post: blog post content. Identify what is missing based on audience needs, relevant consensus content, audience pain points, or useful research and data. Also identify content that is irrelevant to reader intent, outdated, vague, or otherwise unhelpful. Give specific, topic- and audience-relevant recommendations. Include consensus topics only when they are valuable to this audience; prioritize meaningful content gaps and integrate research only where it naturally fits. 09
Here are the writing style rules: write in first person (“we,” “our”) and address the reader as “you,” clearly distinguishing the author from the reader. Use a friendly, informed, conversational tone and natural contractions. Vary sentence structure, be concise and specific, and avoid filler. Use relevant examples, analogies, and explanatory details thoughtfully. Vary vocabulary, write for the audience, and keep the prose engaging and accessible. Use paragraphs of no more than 4 sentences, vary paragraph length, use lists where useful without overusing them, and organize the article with an appropriate H2, H3, and H4 heading structure. Do you understand these rules? 10
Write an updated draft of the blog post. Keep valuable existing content and do not change the wording of content you recommend keeping. Add the recommended material thoughtfully, reordering existing and new content where useful. Use clear blog structure and put the information most relevant to the audience early. 11
Evaluate the updated content by scoring Research, Actionability, Call-to-action, and Structure from 1 to 10. Explain each score and, for any lower score, give specific improvement ideas. Research means support from trustworthy evidence; Actionability means readers can apply the guidance; Call-to-action means there is one clear, focused next step; Structure means the post is easy to navigate and read. 12
Using your evaluation and recommendations, improve the blog content. Keep parts that do not need improvement exactly the same and implement the recommended changes. 13
Review the blog post from the perspective of a reader new to the subject. Considering the audience’s assumed knowledge and experience, identify anything they might not understand or need explained. Recommend ways to clarify it without oversimplifying. 14
Implement the recommendations from the naive-reader review. Keep parts that do not need improvement exactly the same. 15
Review the blog post from a critical or skeptical reader’s perspective. Identify subjective, debatable, or unsupported claims that could undermine confidence in the writer or publisher. Recommend how to provide alternative perspectives or substantiate those claims. 16
Implement the recommendations from the critical review while keeping parts that do not need improvement exactly the same. 17
Review the full blog post for language that sounds unnatural or too formal. Recommend adjustments that make it conversational and accessible while preserving an informed, experienced voice. 18
Implement the tone recommendations while keeping parts that do not need improvement exactly the same. 19
Write 3 meta description ideas, each under 150 characters. Focus on specific reader benefits and search intent, using a relevant keyword naturally in the first half when appropriate. Use active voice and a positive, confident, casual tone; be specific and avoid jargon, vague language, and terms such as “boost,” “drive,” or “discover.” Make the ideas compelling while accurately reflecting the article. Append them to the beginning of the full content under the label “Meta Descriptions:” without changing the existing content. 20
Write 3 meta title ideas, each under 60 characters. Use the exact blog title if it fits; otherwise, condense it while preserving its meaning. Focus on the audience’s search intent and use conversational, specific language. If space allows, add a concise format or style phrase in brackets before a pipe and the publishing company name. Append these ideas to the beginning of the full content under the label “Meta Titles:” without changing the existing content.